The Federal Government Employees Amendment Bill, a subject of intense debate, was approved yesterday by the House of Representatives. Members voiced varied opinions on the bill and its accompanying amendment report, focusing on its implications for federal employees, particularly regarding working hours and operational dynamics.
Key Points Raised by Members of the House
Criticism of Repealed Provisions:
Several members criticized the amendment for repealing previous court-like proclamations that were tailored to specific organizational and operational needs based on the unique characteristics of their work.
Concerns About Administrative Staff:
It was noted that the bill failed to provide adequate attention to federal court administrative staff, despite prioritizing employees of the Revenue and Customs Commission.
Job Advertisement Equity:
Members highlighted the lack of clarity regarding fair and equal job advertisement conditions across different regions, which is crucial for ensuring an inclusive recruitment process.
Internal Transfers and Dismissals:
The draft faced criticism for provisions allowing institutional heads to transfer employees at will for efficiency. Members argued that this could lead to operational gaps and potential dismissal of employees unwilling to comply with such transfers.
Statements from Key Council Members
Dr. Desalegn Chane (NAMA Council Member):
On Proclamation Preparation:
“Such proclamations require thorough preparation and consultation. Workers’ concerns should be addressed comprehensively.”
Concerns About Quota Distribution:
Dr. Chane warned that the draft’s premise, suggesting the civil service is dominated by one group, could lead to a quota system. “Competence and ability should guide the civil service, not arbitrary quotas,” he said.
Employee Rights Violations:
He expressed concern over clauses allowing the Civil Service Commission to transfer employees arbitrarily, stating, “This violates employees’ rights and leaves their fate at the mercy of superiors, forcing some to resign.”
Working Hours Increase:
Dr. Chane strongly opposed the increase in weekly working hours from 39 to 48, calling it “inappropriate and unfair to workers.”
Dr. Aweke Amzaye (Ezema Member):
On Contradictory Ideas:
Dr. Amzaye criticized the draft’s emphasis on “modernization” while simultaneously incorporating ethnic-based hiring practices. “Hiring based on ethnicity contradicts the idea of creating a modern, merit-based bureaucracy,” he argued.
Religious Preaching in Institutions:
He noted that government institutions are increasingly becoming venues for religious activities, stressing, “This should be strictly prohibited by law.”
Professional Growth Hindrances:
Dr. Amzaye cautioned that giving superiors unchecked authority to reassign employees stifles professional growth, undermining the civil service.
Human Rights Concerns:
He likened the provisions to legalizing modern slavery, stating, “The court should intervene to ensure justice.”
Ato Lemma Tessema (Council Member):
Systematic Changes Needed:
Ato Lemma emphasized that the draft fails to classify employees based on education, experience, and qualifications, which are essential for an effective civil service.
Opportunities for All Ethiopians:
“The draft proclamation offers an opportunity for all Ethiopians to compete and work based on qualifications,” he noted, advocating for the inclusive intent of the amendments.
Response from the Standing Committee Chairman
Dr. Negeri Lencho, Chair of the Standing Committee on Human Resources Development, addressed members’ concerns, stating:
Court-Specific Provisions:
“The Merit and Salary Board, to be established under the draft proclamation and chaired by the Prime Minister, will address issues specific to federal courts.”
No Quota System:
Dr. Negeri assured that the draft explicitly rejects quotas, focusing instead on competency and management.
Employee Rights Safeguarded:
He highlighted procedural safeguards for employees, ensuring their rights are protected during transfers and disciplinary actions.
Final Decision
Despite the controversies, the Federal Government Employees Proclamation No. 1353/2017 was approved with a majority vote. Only three members opposed the bill, and four abstained. The increase in working hours from 39 to 48 has drawn significant attention and remains a critical concern for many employees and stakeholders.
